I have access to Nolo Trippen's unpublished writings, not just what was used in
Liberalese. Trippen was ahead of the curve in crafing the historically innocuous into something invidious, thus assuring the world of a never-ending corocopia of things the Left could find ojectionable. He wrote:
Not long ago, a nation known as the United States (E pluribus unum: "out of many, one" -- as long as you're white) got in a little dust up with socialist and imperialist powers overseas. Happily, the US didn't end up fighting communist powers at the same time because the socialists (Nazis) turned on the communists (Soviets) before the communists could turn on the socialists. The US had to fight whatever was left over: the GIPs (Germans, Italians, Japanese). The US was pretty much out of line from the get-go in this war. Having been mildly bombed in a non-transparent-surprise attack by the Japanese, the US did not answer with equivalent force, but nuked the innocents of Nippon. This lack of a reasonable response still drives the US and Israel (but no other nation) to this day.
Today, Trippen has competition in rewriting WWII history. Here's Tom Hanks being interviewed for his HBO series, The Pacific, "Back in World War II we viewed the Japanese as 'yellow, slant-eyed dogs' that believed in different gods. They were out to kill us because our way of living was different. We, in turn, wanted to annihilate them because they were different. Does that sound familiar, by any chance, to what's going on today?" (interview with Douglas Brinkley, Time, 6 March 2010).
No Tom, it doesn't. The US threw in with the Entente Powers during WWI of which Japan was a member. So was Russia and Italy and Romania. Racism had nothing at all to do with Japan attacking us on 7 December 1941. Japan didn't like the US meddling in the Japanese invasion and devastation of China (the Chinese, you know, are different, so why would we care, Tom?). We wanted Japan out of China. Japan wanted to stay. The Japanese hoped to gain time to build up their already considerable military by crippling US and UK forces in the region. Japan had seen a lack of willingness to fund our own military (one Japanese observer was inspired when he saw Yanks train with broom sticks because not enough rifles were available) and decided to strike, as most bullies do, when we were weakest. Also, these 'yellow, slant-eyed dogs' were treated rather well after the war by the United States which helped it morph into one the world's top industrial powers. Of course, we gulaged 75,000 Japanese American citizens during WWII (under Franklin D. Roosevelt), but they were just a different "kind" of American, so no big deal for the Left.
And how are we annihilating our "because they (are) different" enemies today? America makes a habit of keeping civilian casualties to a minimum. If we hated our enemy so much, why are we helping to establish the first Arabic democracies in the region? Why are we risking our lives in a war that the Tom Hanks of the world can only myopically see in the most juvenile terms? True, we will probably have a military presence in the region for years to come, but we still have a military presence in Japan, South Korea, and Germany.